Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Identity Helpunknown stone ?
4th Jul 2017 22:37 UTCsunstone sunstone
nearly all of the egyptians do not care with the beach stones whatever they are to the extent that collecting stones is a strange Hobby .
but I do want to know their identity .
5th Jul 2017 00:32 UTCDoug Daniels
5th Jul 2017 08:07 UTCsunstone sunstone
here's another one :
5th Jul 2017 12:13 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
5th Jul 2017 12:23 UTCPaul Brandes 🌟 Manager
5th Jul 2017 13:25 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert
5th Jul 2017 13:33 UTCsunstone sunstone
there are all colors reddish brown , reddish orange and yellow they are all translucent .only the reddish brown stones appear red on the lamp light .
5th Jul 2017 13:35 UTCsunstone sunstone
there is one or two broken ones here :
5th Jul 2017 14:16 UTCsunstone sunstone
-------------------------------------------------------
> To me, it's odd that no matter what the outside
> colour is, they all show up as red when back lit.
> They all look like some sort of microcrystalline
> quartz (chalcedony) that have been stained over
> time. Reiner is correct in that you'll have to
> break one open so we can see what the fracture
> looks like. In addition, a hardness and streak
> test would be most helpful...
the brownish ones have unusual translucency and appear red when back light .
I did not notice any conchoidal fractures and they are all cannot be scratched by knife tip .
I noticed patterns of banding that looks like banded agate especially on some of the translucent brown stones .
there are many gray translucent stones as well ( several kilograms )
5th Jul 2017 14:30 UTCAlfred L. Ostrander
I don't see any color banding in the pieces that would indicate agate.
As you indicated you found these on a beach and they have been worn smooth by being tumbled in the sand by wave action. Still, some of the characteristics of the stones can still be seen. A few pieces have not been smoothed out enough to remove the evidence for conchoidal fracture and not all the original surfaces indicating a botryoidal habit have been worn away. The manner the stones have been smoothed out by tumbling in the sand, the botryoidal habit, the conchoidal fracture all fit an identification of chalcedony. The colors fit for the varities known as carnelian and sard. Look up carnelian and sard and see what you think.
5th Jul 2017 14:57 UTCsunstone sunstone
-------------------------------------------------------
> Based on taking a good look at all the photos, it
> appears you are finding chalcedony. The red is
> called carnelian and the brownish red are known as
> sard.
> I don't see any color banding in the pieces that
> would indicate agate.
>
> As you indicated you found these on a beach and
> they have been worn smooth by being tumbled in the
> sand by wave action. Still, some of the
> characteristics of the stones can still be seen. A
> few pieces have not been smoothed out enough to
> remove the evidence for conchoidal fracture and
> not all the original surfaces indicating a
> botryoidal habit have been worn away. The manner
> the stones have been smoothed out by tumbling in
> the sand, the botryoidal habit, the conchoidal
> fracture all fit an identification of chalcedony.
> The colors fit for the varities known as carnelian
> and sard. Look up carnelian and sard and see what
> you think.
I agree with you about reddish carnelian and yellowish sard there is many of them . but I think that there are many banded brownish Sardonyx and some of the banded agate ( not pictured ) . it is a huge collection but I did not notice any conchoidal fracture sure I will search about it . sorry all that was old pictures and I do not have new ones .
many thanks
5th Jul 2017 15:32 UTCOwen Lewis
So my guess is, as Alfred says, mainly varieties of chalcedony. The pieces you show above are interesting because they seem to be translucent, some to absorb strongly blue light and be well suited to ornamental use. However, IMO, there is not a hope of a certain ID without the results from a series of accurately carried out hardness tests and SG determinations. From the little I know of the area, I'd say that what you collect are all that is left of ornamental stonework from the sea-side villas of the rich around Alexandria. If this is so, then the true origin of the mineral(s) will never be known.
On one holiday, lying on the sandy beach in front of my hotel I had the strong impression that, at a certain time of day and with the sun in a certain position, the beach almost seemed to glow. I was curious enough to drop a couple of pinches of this beach sand into a bag and bring it home to put it under a camera and illuminated with a diffused white back-light. Here is what I saw:
Image 1. A small sample of the sand I brought home; dry and sprinkled of a 30mm transparent and colourless polystyrene dish. At this magnification, there's nothing to get excited about,
Image 2. However, selecting, cropping and enlarging a section of the whole image file gives us this!
One day, I shall have some real fun with this sand, testing it out carefully with microscope, polariscope. refractive index testing fluids and a damn good electronic scale and density determination kit. For now, and just from the pic and knowing exactly where the sand came from, I know there is at least one gem mineral present in abundance. To say how many more gem species are present and to calculate the % by mass of each present in my collected sample requires a little more work.
I may not be a rich man - but I know where some riches are! :-) And that's before we get to the octahedral diamond crystal that is still pretty much where it was found, a few hundred metres from the western South Atlantic, that's the size of a hen's egg - and then there's the ametrine site in Canada. And no, I'm not saying where that is either. In each case, the locals prefer to keep their peace, quiet and quality of life as it is. These are truly precious things that money can't buy. Nor even buy my memories of them
Keep looking and finding - but do more testing as well.
5th Jul 2017 17:12 UTCsunstone sunstone
and I repeat your words about the stones :
( used for architectural ornamentation in ancient times in Egypt right through the rise and fall of the Roman Empire.)
also you said : ( what you collect are all that is left of ornamental stonework from the sea-side villas of the rich around Alexandria )
many thanks for you all
10th Jul 2017 21:47 UTCsunstone sunstone
10th Jul 2017 22:43 UTCOwen Lewis
There is *nothing* in your pictures that suggests a coral, be it mediterranean, fossilised or otherwise. Read up and study images of the typical calcereous and conchiolin structures for the various species. Get to see some real samples in the Cairo Museum.
11th Jul 2017 01:59 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
11th Jul 2017 06:53 UTCsunstone sunstone
sponge coral here : http://coral.org.in/what-is-red-sponge-coral-stone/
11th Jul 2017 12:31 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
11th Jul 2017 17:04 UTCDoug Schonewald
They are not associated with sponge coral, or any other coral for that matter. These are simply water tumbled quartz pebbles (most likely chalcedony). Chalcedony occurs regularly in volcanic environments and you've said in past posts that the area where these come from is a volcanic area. There are no conchoidal fractures because you haven't broken them. When small pebbles are water washed for a very long time the grinding and polishing of the sands removes any evidence of fracture types. This occurs in both rivers and beaches and in fresh and salt water. It is not unlike putting broken quartz rocks in a tumbler. In a few weeks or months you will have very smooth rounded pebbles. The lines and features you see are not uncommon in chalcedony, in fact, I would expect them to be there and would be slightly surprised if they were not there.
11th Jul 2017 21:27 UTCGregg Little 🌟
Your pictures appears to be slag (man-made glass), agate, chalcedony and silicified sedimentary material in general. This is typical stuff that, due to its resistance to abrasion, is found in beaches and rivers.
As Owen indicates it still is interesting and can be economically important sources (eg. gold, monazite, diamond, ruby, etc.)
12th Jul 2017 08:04 UTCsunstone sunstone
here is a sample of two mature opaque stones one red and the other black knowing that I have many others .
back side of the stone
12th Jul 2017 10:23 UTCOwen Lewis
-------------------------------------------------------
> The translucency of these is unusual. The only
> explanation I have is that it is ancient slag.
> What does one look like broken open? What is the
> specific gravity and hardness?
Reiner, In N.America, your explanation would be very likely. But, as said previously, picked off an Alexandrian (Egypt) beach, they are most likely water-worn architectural rubble that is 500 - 5,000 years old. Remains from any of several earlier civilizations, such can be picked off the beaches and shallow waters around much/most of the central and eastern Mediterranean. As artefacts, these pieces can have no mineralogical significance though they may sometimes be of archeological interest. Nil commercial value.
As you also suggest, no mineral ID of such rubble is possible without patient and accurate testing since the locality of find is almost always without (mineralogical) significance.
12th Jul 2017 10:23 UTCWayne Corwin
The red one (5460/1) is slag.
12th Jul 2017 21:39 UTCsunstone sunstone
-------------------------------------------------------
> Reiner Mielke Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The translucency of these is unusual. The only
> > explanation I have is that it is ancient slag.
> > What does one look like broken open? What is
> the
> > specific gravity and hardness?
>
> Reiner, In N.America, your explanation would be
> very likely. But, as said previously, picked off
> an Alexandrian (Egypt) beach, they are most
> likely water-worn architectural rubble that is 500
> - 5,000 years old. Remains from any of several
> earlier civilizations, such can be picked off the
> beaches and shallow waters around much/most of the
> central and eastern Mediterranean. As artefacts,
> these pieces can have no mineralogical
> significance though they may sometimes be of
> archeological interest. Nil commercial value.
>
> As you also suggest, no mineral ID of such rubble
> is possible without patient and accurate testing
> since the locality of find is almost always
> without (mineralogical) significance.
many thanks but I think that rubble or slag cannot be unique and beautiful like that stones ( black sponge coral I think )
12th Jul 2017 22:30 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
12th Jul 2017 23:39 UTCOwen Lewis
-------------------------------------------------------
...... unique and beautiful like that stones ( black
> sponge coral I think )
>
This conversation becomes meaningless. 'Sponge coral' is a contradiction in terms. 'Sponge' and 'coral' are , generically, the names of two different families of simple animal species that live under water. There are some black sponges and some black corals, neither of which are found in the Medterranean as far as I know. Black sponges are soft-centred with a leathery surface. Black coral does not have a rigid and brittle inorganic calcereous skeleton, as do the reef-building corals. Rather, its supporting skeleton is built up from layered growth of excreted conchiolin, a tough and flexible organic compound.
Anyone who has handled corals will know with certainty that none of the photographs you switch about shows a coral, black or otherwise, nor do they show any fossilised coral. The problem with your posts is that often repeated nonsenses can confuse some others who read here and might accept your quite unreasoned opinions as truths.
It is a good rule that, if one cannot clearly support an opinion with either (1) clear photography of identifying features or (2) data from several types of testing (preferably giving both), it's better not to offer any opinion at all.
Anyway, I'm now finished in these threads which will reduce the general noise a little :-/
13th Jul 2017 00:02 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
It does get rather tiring doesn't it. Just so you know, I admire your patience and persistence. Thanks for "carrying the load".
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 3, 2024 22:22:03
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 3, 2024 22:22:03