Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Identity HelpCan anyone help me identify this raw crystal I was given that was found in a collectors junk clearout

17th Apr 2024 00:52 UTCKatie Ragans

08693480017133151432946.jpg
It's color varies with lighting. Can be green at times or brown an a one corner has slight rainbow inclusion with rotation an lighting hitting it.

Questions Answered
Can it scratch glass? : Yes
Can you scratch it with your fingernail? : No
Is it light/heavy for the size? : Heavy

17th Apr 2024 01:06 UTCFrank K. Mazdab 🌟 Manager

To add additional photos to a thread, reply to yourself and include a photo in the reply. You can reply to yourself as many times as necessary. I'm going to close your other threads so please re-add your other photos/comments to this thread. Once you've done so I'm going to delete the two other duplicate threads.

17th Apr 2024 01:39 UTCKatie Ragans

03755660017133153288849.jpg
Additional photo

17th Apr 2024 01:40 UTCKatie Ragans

01183700017133180069271.jpg
Additional photos

17th Apr 2024 01:41 UTCKatie Ragans

09867490017133154432299.jpg
Another photo

17th Apr 2024 01:42 UTCKatie Ragans

03786060017133181062750.jpg
Another

17th Apr 2024 01:43 UTCKatie Ragans

02546210017133181828952.jpg
Another 

17th Apr 2024 01:44 UTCKatie Ragans

03485500017133182455890.jpg
Lastly

17th Apr 2024 01:46 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert

I'm guessing that it didn't come with any locality information.  Can you tell us where (town, state/province, country) you acquired it, or where the collector lived?  That may be a clue.

17th Apr 2024 03:32 UTCKatie Ragans

05725910017133247486591.jpg
Not at all it came with alot in a frame work holder with printed labels most worn off can't read them and some still glued in that one happened to be free came off and caught my eye the most

17th Apr 2024 03:33 UTCKatie Ragans

01323180017133247956915.jpg
This also

17th Apr 2024 02:51 UTCKevin Conroy Manager

It looks like glass.

17th Apr 2024 03:31 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

My thoughts too

17th Apr 2024 03:34 UTCKatie Ragans

00595250017133248881195.jpg
It has rock formation on bottom but yes is glassy at the top

17th Apr 2024 15:17 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Agree.

17th Apr 2024 03:41 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

Katie

SO was the specimen part of the rock collection in the subsequent photos?
If so, why not say so at the beginning of the thread to give context to the acquisition?

Your photos are not very clear.
If you can see any bubbles at all in the specimen then it is glass / slag glass. 

The most likely mineral it resembles is quartz (smoky).

17th Apr 2024 14:08 UTCKatie Ragans

06555050017133628745917.jpg
Thanks I did mention in collectors junk clear out. . I was only looking to identify this one as the rest I know or can make out the identifying label. Except imaging attactching now...this one looks like goldsheer or something i cant find when google it.

17th Apr 2024 16:13 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert

There is a variety of obsidian known in the lapidary and metaphysical worlds as "golden sheen" obsidian.  This piece looks like obsidian, so perhaps that's what the label once said.

17th Apr 2024 23:18 UTCKatie Ragans

It does not have any bubbles. There are multiple rainbow inclusions probably from it being dropped probably smokey quartz.

18th Apr 2024 00:05 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

This photo does not appear to be the same specimen as in the first photo of this thread?

17th Apr 2024 12:38 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert

The rock-like bottom material suggests that this is "slag glass", surplus or unusable glass that was discarded from a manufacturing process.  It often is poured on a floor, the ground, etc. and picks up debris where it makes contact.

For future reference, specimen photos work best when the specimen is placed on a plain, untextured white background like a sheet of paper so there is no movement and so the camera can focus on the specimen and not the background.  Taking good photos of rocks is harder than it looks and may take some practice.

17th Apr 2024 23:41 UTCKevin Conroy Manager

Ed Clopton 🌟 Expert  ✉️

photos work best when the specimen is placed on a plain, untextured white background like a sheet of paper
It's critical that we can see the true color(s) of the specimen, and as Ed said a good way to do this is to have a plain white background.

19th Apr 2024 02:02 UTCKatie Ragans

01545920017134921301475.jpg
That black circle is adhesive that it was stuck to in showcase box he had before it came loose.

19th Apr 2024 02:03 UTCKatie Ragans

02090900017134921844436.jpg
Much better indeed with the white 

19th Apr 2024 02:03 UTCKatie Ragans

01291500017134922294555.jpg
Few more

19th Apr 2024 02:04 UTCKatie Ragans

03433150017134922584940.jpg
All angles

19th Apr 2024 02:04 UTCKatie Ragans

04937380017134922843035.jpg
Hope that helps

19th Apr 2024 16:48 UTCVolker Betz 🌟 Expert

I am sorry, if the background is white, then this pictures are underexposed. It is a common fault that pictures out of the camera are ok. Optimal pictures always need post processing.
Or at least they can much improved by post processing.

20th Apr 2024 22:57 UTCKatie Ragans

04264340017136538606203.jpg
Better?

20th Apr 2024 22:58 UTCKatie Ragans

08877560017136538859743.jpg
This too 

20th Apr 2024 22:59 UTCKatie Ragans

06146110017136539482298.jpg
☺️ 

20th Apr 2024 22:59 UTCKatie Ragans

03457100017136539794959.jpg
🙂 

20th Apr 2024 23:00 UTCKatie Ragans

04813860017136540075277.jpg
Much better 

20th Apr 2024 23:01 UTCKatie Ragans

06510450017136540608416.jpg
That black spot on bottom is glue from where it came off its showcase section it was glued to

20th Apr 2024 23:02 UTCKatie Ragans

01464890017136541256207.jpg
Last one

20th Apr 2024 23:23 UTCLalith Aditya Senthil Kumar

Seems to be smokey quartz.

21st Apr 2024 09:21 UTCChristian Klein

Hi Katie
very good pictures! But this is definitely not natural material. It is some kind of glass, partically melted and partially granular, it can come from the boundary of a large crucible or was poured in liquid form onto some surface. Nothing wrong with it, just not natural.
so long
Christian

21st Apr 2024 10:49 UTCFrank Mersch

Hi,

nearly the same thoughts - perhaps a Zirconia from a skull melting process? In this case it will scratch glass easily!

Frank
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 30, 2024 06:04:24
Go to top of page