I did notice on the main Allophane photos on mindat, none listed Chrysocolla with the Allophane.

Still quite interesting to me.

Thank you for your input so far.

   Your bright blue opaque (?) material looks like chrysocolla. 

   I have two pretty sweet Arizona chrysocolla specimens. They both very slowly shed flakes of material, probably from surficial dehydrating. In about two hunded years they may not be the same sweet specimens.

  It is not uncommon to see shrinkage cracks in thin layers of chrysocolla. Allophane does seem to crack up more easily from dehydration than chrysocolla. 

   There was a third clay-like component in the Graphic specimens that I had tested, but it was minor, increasing in the chalky white gibbsite-rich material. The allophane that I had tested was from an isolated place inside the mine. My results are only good for what I collected.

   It is not generally safe to visually ID allophane. There are other minerals that it could be besides chrysocolla, it could be chalcoalumite or something else.

   I am mentioning the following for everybody out there- The NMBGMR offers xrd services. The prices are variable. You can email Kelsey McNamara for estimates.  Often somebody will send in a fist-sized rock and ask something along the lines of "What are the black specks in the middle of the rock?". People don't understand that xrd samples require preparation, resulting in a pinch of only the questionable item. Instead of paying somebody else to break down the rock, and isolating the questionable grain(s) with a microscope, which could take a couple of hours, save yourself some money by doing it yourself. Using a small container, like a micromount box or a capsule, send in only grains of the material that you question. If the material is ready to be crushed it will save the preparer a lot of time, also increasing the likelihood of it getting into "the pipeline" and tested quicker.