Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryMineral Visual ExplorerAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorPhoto Colour ExplorerNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dilworth, Katherine M, Mortensen, James K, Ebert, Shane, Tosdal, Richard M, Smith, Moira T, Roberts, Paul (2007) Cretaceous reduced granitoids in the Goodpaster Mining District, east central Alaska. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44 (9) 1347-1373 doi:10.1139/e07-014

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleCretaceous reduced granitoids in the Goodpaster Mining District, east central Alaska
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsDilworth, Katherine MAuthor
Mortensen, James KAuthor
Ebert, ShaneAuthor
Tosdal, Richard MAuthor
Smith, Moira TAuthor
Roberts, PaulAuthor
Year2007 (September 1)Volume44
Issue9
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e07-014Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID484339Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:484339:3
GUID0
Full ReferenceDilworth, Katherine M, Mortensen, James K, Ebert, Shane, Tosdal, Richard M, Smith, Moira T, Roberts, Paul (2007) Cretaceous reduced granitoids in the Goodpaster Mining District, east central Alaska. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44 (9) 1347-1373 doi:10.1139/e07-014
Plain TextDilworth, Katherine M, Mortensen, James K, Ebert, Shane, Tosdal, Richard M, Smith, Moira T, Roberts, Paul (2007) Cretaceous reduced granitoids in the Goodpaster Mining District, east central Alaska. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44 (9) 1347-1373 doi:10.1139/e07-014
In(2007, September) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 44 (9) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes The >5 Moz (1 oz (troy) = 31.103 g) gold veins of the Liese Zone and nearby prospects in the Goodpaster Mining District of east central Alaska are spatially and temporally associated with late-Early to Late Cretaceous reduced granitoids that are divided into a granite suite, tonalite suite, and diorite suite in decreasing age. Synkinematic to postkinematic biotite ± hornblende granite, granodiorite, pegmatite, and two-mica granite with accessory garnet compose the granite suite (109–107 Ma). The tonalite suite (107–103 Ma) forms small to large bodies of postkinematic hornblende–biotite granodiorite to tonalite with rare granite. Intruding the granite and parts of the tonalite suites are aplite and pegmatite that grade through sugary pegmatoidal or aplitic quartz veins and finally into quartz veins along strike. The diorite suite (95.4–93.7 Ma) consists of small stocks of diorite to tonalite that intrude the older suites and are inferred to intrude the shallowly dipping auriferous quartz veins. Limited data indicate granitoid emplacement at 5–9 km depths, consistent with formation of the auriferous quartz veins based upon published fluid inclusion data. The weakly peraluminous granite and tonalite suites are distinguished by variable amounts of monazite and zircon whereas the diorite suite is metaluminous, contains <5% magnetite, and lacks monazite. All suites are subalkalic, calc-alkaline and have low magnetic susceptibilities, high large-ion lithophile element/high field-strength element (LILE/HFSE), and depleted Nb and Ti. The granite suite has higher 206Pb/204Pb values (19.4–19.6) than the diorite (19.1). Overall the granite and tonalite suites likely represent melts generated late during crustal thickening that intruded along shallowly dipping faults during exhumation, whereas the diorite suite represents postdeformation melts that underwent less interaction with the old silicic crust.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org® is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Mindat® and mindat.org® are registered trademarks of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2026, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: June 6, 2026 00:13:44
Go to top of page