Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Fakes & FraudsFake dumortierite

10th Nov 2015 12:42 UTCJohn Collins

After admiring today's (Nov 10/15) mineral of the day, I checked out eBay's listing of Dumortierites and noted that many are from China and these very similar looking (imbedded in little quartz crystals), and exceptionally similar in description. I was amused to see that the China ones I looked at could only specify "China" as the source location.

I note that Mindat does not list China as a possible source location for dumortierite.


Would I be naive to assume that these specimens from China are fake?

10th Nov 2015 14:34 UTCPeter Slootweg 🌟

I do not think you are naive at all. I find them very suspicious as well. Especially with the darker colors and always in very transparent crystals that show a peculiar luster that is the same on all faces. I cannot be sure however. Time will tell.


Peter

19th Nov 2015 16:39 UTCcascaillou

Just checked ebay, china is usually given as the item location (not as stone origin). These are most certainly the brazilian material. And indeed it seems that many of these crystals have had their facets polished (I hate when they do that!). Also, I'm not aware of any heat treatment for dumortierite.

19th Nov 2015 16:45 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

So are these lab grown???

19th Nov 2015 17:09 UTCcascaillou

The brazilian material is for real. There was a GIA article about it. Moreover, while I've never examined any of these myself, just from looking at the pictures (surface features and inclusions) they look natural. Anyway I seriously doubt it is even possible to synthesize such included quartz, at best you could re-grow damaged terminations of a natural included quartz crystal via hydrothermal synthesis process.

I also noticed that most are from the same seller, so the guy most probably bought a batch from brazil and is now selling retail (which could account for the rather low prices...this and the fact that many have visible damage to the terminations and edges).

19th Nov 2015 17:11 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

It would be nice if someone posted the link to the specimen in question.

19th Nov 2015 17:17 UTCcascaillou

here is a page with some of the best looking synthetic quartz crystals I've seen to date (with a few natural quartz crystals mixed in for comparison):


http://www.mineral-forum.com/message-board/viewtopic.php?t=4243


Note that the link also features a before/after picture of a natural quartz which damaged terminations have been synthetically regrown (this is tricky).

19th Nov 2015 17:27 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Thanks Cascaillou, I thought they were real, but the title of this thread threw me.


19th Nov 2015 17:44 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

It is very common to polish the faces of quartz crystals to better see the inclusions inside, when they have interesting inclusions. For those interested in inclusions, this is necessary and much more aesthetic. It should not be considered "fakery".


I suppose if someone bought a specimen believing it to be a naturally shiny perfect quartz crystal, and then later was disappointed to find out that the faces had been polished, then that person might use the word "fake", but such a mistake could only happen to a real beginner.


U.S. Customs requires polished stones to be marked with the name of the country where the work was done on it. So "China" does not necessarily mean the quartz crystal originally came from there. As others pointed out, the new dumortierite-included ones are from Brazil.

19th Nov 2015 17:53 UTCcascaillou

Polishing erases mineralogical features (i.e. surface growth features), and as an inclusions nerd I think these are important features of a crystal, thus I would only consider polishing if all faces were actually too frosty to allow any good view of the inclusions. Unfortunately, it seems many suppliers (especially in brazil) routinely polish facets even when unnecessary.

19th Nov 2015 18:01 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

They know what sells ;-)

19th Nov 2015 18:18 UTCcascaillou

Sure they sell their stuff. But let's consider the following: there are thousands of included quartz showing poor transparency (which will thus get polished), however there are much fewer showing both interesting inclusions and naturally good transparency, thus as it comes to inclusions-quartz the transparency is definitely a rarity and quality factor. Now if you would polish it, then you would just erase what makes it exceptional, and turn it back into one of the throusands others lower quality included quartz.


I mean that would be like heat treating a sapphire which is already naturally showing best color (that would simply lessen its value which is linked to the rarity of such color in the nature). Indeed color and clarity are quality factors considering that best grade color and best grade clarity are very rare.

19th Nov 2015 18:34 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

I'll bet an unpolished clean xl that has good inclusions would sell for more than a polished one and it wouldn't take the sellers long to discover that.

19th Nov 2015 18:54 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

In the case of these dumortierites, they are almost all quite ugly unless polished. Included quartz crystals with nice optically smooth faces are quite rare, perhaps because of growth distortions caused by the inclusions themselves? It's much easier to find perfect quartz crystals that don't have inclusions!

19th Nov 2015 19:04 UTCcascaillou

that's exactly my point Alfredo:


quartz without interesting inclusions + frosty faces = extremely common specimen

quartz without interesting inclusions + naturally smooth faces = common specimen

interesting inclusions + frosty faces = uncommon specimen (and polishing can improve it)

interesting inclusions + naturally smooth faces = very rare specimen (and polishing would just negates its rarity)


But as Rob pointed out, the market currently doesn't really take this rarity factor into account.


ps: Alfredo, I don't think the inclusions are responsible for the frosty faces, indeed even without any inclusions, quartz with high clarity is still less common than quartz without. Simply because ideal growth condition are less commonly achieved in nature.

20th Nov 2015 02:54 UTCLawrie Berthelsen (2)

I just received one of these, bought from a Chinese Ebay dealer. I thought it was natural, but after reading this thread I had a closer look, and yes, it has had the faces polished. This doesn't worry me a lot with this specimen, but full disclosure would have been nice.


What does worry me however, is that the colour in real life is a quite dull grey-blue, but on Ebay they are depicted as a bright, intense blue. There are now quite a few Chinese sellers carrying these, as well as cabochons, and they are usually depicted as a bright blue. The few American Ebay dealers selling them depict them as the more natural colour.


So, buyer beware!


Lawrie.

20th Nov 2015 13:18 UTCcascaillou

yeah I was suspecting some color manipulation in some of the pictures to get this deep blue color which did not match what I had seen previously from reputable sellers.

20th Nov 2015 14:50 UTCSteve Federico

Dear Rob,sorry to butt into this thread but that rock pic is awesome.So is it "fake" or real?Blue christmas trees on snow covered ground frozen in Quartz.Great stuff no matter the origin.Thanks........Steve

20th Nov 2015 15:25 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Hi Steve, yes they are real, not faked or lab grown. As Alfredo pointed out polishing an xl to make the inclusions more visible is specimen preparation and not fakery!

21st Nov 2015 11:43 UTCSteve Federico

Thanks Rob.....Steve

21st Nov 2015 15:09 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Here's some material with unpolished faces. http://www.minfind.com/search.php?qs=dumortierite You can see why the faces get polished.

29th Mar 2016 23:09 UTCGiorgio Penco

06457040016016947182618.jpg
Copyright © mindat.org

02475990015659402501187.jpg

08505120015659402514370.jpg



Hi all, this is the first time I write in MinDat.

It seems to me that it is very hard to believe that dumortierite quartz is natural. If you look at the photo albums in https://www.facebook.com/hurgie.crystal/media_set?set=a.787495327995846.1073742571.100002061580321&type=3 you will find a lot, an incredible quantity of crystals in quartz. Dumortierite, but also anatase, dendrites, brookite, connellite and some other ... plus phantoms, rainbows, bubbles, strange inclusions and even quartz clusters inside other quartzes. Often in a single specimen you can find 3 o 4 different inclusions.

Such materials seems to be growth without any logical order and without knowing the usual mineralogical criteria. For example there are a lot of rutilated quartzes, but almost never you can find the classical exagonal twinning. Instead all the different included minerals (rutile, connellite, dumortierite, ...) seem to grow in 2 different ways: as "flowers" or around a single central crystal.

If you consider that the vendor sells an incredible quantity of different specimens, but the same material can't be found from important vendors like Arkenstone or similar there is more than enough to conclude that the strange "super-included" quartzes are fake.

:-)

30th Mar 2016 06:00 UTCSteve Hardinger 🌟 Expert

"but the same material can't be found from important vendors like Arkenstone or similar there is more than enough to conclude that the strange "super-included" quartzes are fake."


Or that it's below the price point of these dealers. Absence in a dealer's inventory doesn't make it unnatural.

30th Mar 2016 07:27 UTCJoel Dyer

Those pictures uploaded by Giorgio really makes me think that something is "stinking" here.The quartz possibly has fake crystal surfaces, not just polished natural crystal faces, and is that really necessary, if that is the case here?


Things just somehow look too smooth and perfect. I wonder if anyone has analyzed samples such as Giorgio shows properly? If not, why not? Also, how likely is it that such nice, big floater inclusions sit on top of "white sand" or sugar or whatever looking material?


In China they are masters at modifying and manufacturing nearly anything that anyone can imagine, so I certainly am not convinced yet, dspite the comments of much more experienced Mindaters... Pretty the samples undoubtedly are, and I'm sure many buyers are happy with their purchases.


Cheers,

6th Apr 2016 18:15 UTCGiorgio Penco

08978260016016947183860.jpg
Copyright © mindat.org

09177730015659402514426.jpg

09723270015659402516731.jpg



Dear all, I add three more pictures from che same vendor.


The first picture shows a lodolite quartz cointaining also a biterminated quartz. Please note that the junk material that forms the "lodolite" part is completely covered by a sheet of external quartz. It seems that the internal lodolite has an egg shape and never emerges to the surface. In other terms it seems that the external quartz layer has been deposed after having create the internal egg.


The second picture shows a quartz crystal with rutiles included in an external "egg" quartz. Rutile needles seems to be all grown from some curved structure, but there is no evidence of twinning. Again there is a very very unlikely combination of elements (a quartz plus many rutile needles, with a very unusual growth, inside another quartz that wraps all internal elements very well).


The third picture, again, shows the same situation. An internal quartz (in the lower part) with very unusual rutile flowers and all perfectly wrapped inside another quartz.


I wish to say another little thing. There is a document from GIA that speaks of dumortierite needles in quartz. That document states that "dumortierite" is real dumortierite (not another different mineral), but is doesn't say anything, not a single word (from GIA), about a little, decisive detail, is the whole structure natural or synthetic?


:-)

6th Apr 2016 18:31 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

Obviously the surfaces are artificially shaped, but such quartzes + inclusions can easily be natural. The late Rock Currier and two partners used to operate a mine in Brazil for such quartz crystals with "gardens" inside. Rock had hundreds of such examples, some in museum sizes, polished to see the inclusions better, in his personal collection, which is currently being systematically photographed. Expect lots of astonishing photos of ~25 year old material on Mindat soon. Back in those days the quartz was polished in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, but nowadays most gets shipped to China for polishing.

6th Apr 2016 19:03 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

I think the title of this thread is quite misleading. I don't see any evidence of faking with the blue dumortierite needles in quartz. I don't recall seeing any fake photoed on this thread. They are all real included xls!!!

7th Apr 2016 09:42 UTCGiorgio Penco

00545450016016947198323.jpg
Copyright © mindat.org
Good morning all (here in Rome it is a wonderful, sunny morning)!!!

:-)


Well, I think I was not able to explain exactly what I meant ... but maybe the new picture will explain all better than me.



The picture clearly shows an internal egg, with an its own shape and warping, manifactured BEFORE wrapping all into an external layer of quartz. Everyone can believe whatever he wants ... but ...


Moreover the sum of clues can't be ignored.


It is true that there are some specimens that seems to be raw, but actually technology let to imitate raw material as well as such polished eggs. And it is well known that synthetic quartz is often deposited over a natural layer. Natural quartzes can be easily perforated to add internal elements and then closed making new quartz grow inside the hole.




As far as I'm concerned, I have no doubts. Such playthings are manmade.

Giorgio.

:-)


00450750015659402522717.jpg

06870740015659402538828.jpg

7th Apr 2016 09:50 UTCGiorgio Penco

02317090016016947197775.jpg
Copyright © mindat.org

07915870015659402536780.jpg

09000480015659402533026.jpg




... and ... just to show some nice synthetic quartzes ...


This is a part of what you can be, nowadays, with synthetic quartzes.


(All pictures from the following website: http://www.mineral-forum.com/message-board/viewtopic.php?t=4243)


:-)

7th Apr 2016 13:13 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

Giorgio, thanks for the nice photos. But your last three, of synthetically grown crystals, without inclusions, are a bit off-topic here, not related to the question.


Of the three eggs in your previous post, the first one certainly looks like a common chlorite-included quartz from Brazil, whether you believe it or not. I see no evidence of fakery. Actually I think if someone were to go to all the trouble of manufacturing something like that, they would've used more beautiful inclusions! :-D


As for your assertion that "Natural quartzes can be easily perforated to add internal elements and then closed making new quartz grow inside the hole." - do you have any evidence? Any example to show of such a procedure? Surely you aren't suggesting that any of the eggs you've shown here were made by drilling into a natural crystal and sticking the inclusions inside? :-S

7th Apr 2016 16:35 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager

Thanks Giorgio. Your quartzinsidequartz01.jpg is certainly a fake. What makes you think the quartz xls are enclosed in quartz and not glass?


I like the waterworn pebble with the attached xls. A lovely fake.

7th Apr 2016 17:45 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

These "quartz" crystals all look like glass to me.

A simple hardness test would be interesting.

8th Apr 2016 09:40 UTCGiorgio Penco

Dear Rob and Alfredo, I have to say I don't know if the external enclosure are really quartz or just glass. What I know is that the vendor I linked sells all such items saying they are natural quartz with inclusions.


I'm sorry for the three synthetic quartz pictures. I didn't meant to go off topic, but just to show that synthetic quartz can now be produced in very sophisticated ways and shapes. The same web site I linked shows also one picture of a broken cluster of amethyst "repaired" making new quartz grow over the natural amethyst.


There are no techinical issues in making quartz grow inside a hole, considering that we are speaking of hydrothermal growth. Anyway I don't want to say that the eggs are perforated quartz with inclusion added in little holes.


What I really say is that the evidences pro such extraordinary quartzes with several different inclusions aren't unsatisfying and there is no real proof that the best specimens are natural. In some cases they are clearly manmade and this let me suspect that maybe they are "all" manmade.


Instead, for the most simple specimens, it is not difficult to believe in a natural growth.

:-)

26th Dec 2020 18:35 UTCAli Unwala

05736640016090072877950.jpg
Not sure what's the best etique to open a new post or continue on with this one. But I had another possible fake Dumortierite so I thought it would be nice to continue this thread.

I saw this geode with supposed 
dumortierite needles inside posted on EBay. This was a new one for me.

The seller was from china  but mentioned this was from morocco. 

Since many moroccan geodes had been faked in the past + dumortierite not being listed as a Moroccan locality got me thinking this was suspicious.

Anyone got any thoughts on this one?

26th Dec 2020 18:36 UTCAli Unwala

08331330016090077642239.jpg
Here is another picture

26th Dec 2020 19:00 UTCBob Harman

ALI U,     I replied on the other thread.     A natural quartz geode from Morocco with something added into the cavity. The combination example is a fake.       BOB             

27th Dec 2020 03:38 UTCDoug Daniels

Nice fake, though.

18th Feb 2021 13:41 UTCAxel Quris

01238130016136555121625.jpg
I bought a similar mineral recently, and I confirm it is forged (absolutely not dumortierite).
The blue crystals evaporate with a blue flame when burnt.
They dissolve in acids (tested with muriatic and nitric), they give a yellowish green solution in muriatic acid (see picture).
I guess it is a copper compound, maybe hydrated copper carbonate ?

27th Dec 2020 13:23 UTCTorben Kjeldgård

05725330016090752758259.jpg
Also got one from China. To ugly to have been polished. But the seller noted it came from Madagascar.
If true?
If it was polished you might see the xls inside

27th Dec 2020 13:24 UTCTorben Kjeldgård

04650350016090754614973.jpg
the other side
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 6, 2024 21:01:38
Go to top of page