Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Improving Mindat.orgChemical Formular Karibibite

7th Sep 2017 16:42 UTCAndreas Schmid

The published Formular for Karibibite Fe3+(As3+O2)4(As3+2O5)(OH) is wrong. The same mistake occurred in the last LAPIS magazine. Wondering who copied. :-)

Maybe somebody could correct that mistake

7th Sep 2017 16:53 UTCAndreas Schmid

-- moved topic --

7th Sep 2017 17:48 UTCTravis Olds Expert

Subscript for 3 Fe3+ atoms is missing, but also missing in the abstract.

7th Sep 2017 19:02 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Thanks, Travis. Fixed.

That's the problem when journals put abstracts online before the authors had a chance to proof-read them (a policy which had caused me problems as well with a paper, and will lead to perpetuating such errors). Checking proofs usually doesn't take much more than a few days or a week, so why hurry ...?


EDIT: Typo.

7th Sep 2017 20:52 UTCTravis Olds Expert

Agreed. Sometimes when you upload the abstract (by copy & paste) it doesn't preserve formatting, but in that case it would be Fe33+ or something. I guess just a simple mistake that multiple people made, but it's a really nice paper using advanced techniques!

10th Sep 2017 20:43 UTCŁukasz Kruszewski Expert

Fe3+(As3+O2)4(As3+2O5)(OH) is exactly what is written in the abstract, and I am the one who has copied it (-; There is an evident error in the Fe amount - it should be 3.

14th Sep 2017 10:45 UTCHelen Kerbey

Hello, thanks for spotting this. I've attempted to change the abstract, however there is no facility to add any sub or superscripts so I've put in a comma. Hopefully it is okay like this?

We have control over the contents of the prepublications page at MinMag so you can always let us know. They are just copy and paste from the submitted abstracts in pdf form, in this case the actual paper is correct, it was just a copy and paste error from copying from a pdf.
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 11:23:57
Go to top of page