Almost certainly misidentified
churchite-(Y).
Walenta (1995) states in his description of churchite minerals from the Black Forest: "An Seltenen Erden sind Dy, Sm, Gd und Nd vertreten, Y ist dagegen nur in sehr geringen Mengen nachweisbar. Es ist also kein Churchit-(Y), sondern am ehesten ein Churchit-(Dy)". [The name was published without approval; no quantitave data were given.]
No modern quantitative chemical analyses of Walenta's (1995) sample are available, but a re-analysis of a "churchite-(Dy)" from Menzenschwand, Black Forest, clearly showed it to be a churchite-(Y) containing very minor Gd and Dy.
In SEM-EDS spectra there might be a problem of overlap of the Dy L(alpha1+2) lines with the Fe K(alpha) line (the partial Y/P peak overlap is another serious problem for correct quantification - if the Y peaks have been recognised as such!).
Compare also the questionable
Agardite-(Dy).