Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Lorin Fassbender, Marc, Hannington, Mark, Thomas Baxter, Alan, Diekrup, David, Stewart, Margaret, Alexander Brandl, Philipp (2024) Geochemical Signatures of Mafic Volcanic Rocks in Modern Oceanic Settings and Implications for Archean Mafic Magmatism. Economic Geology, 119 (2) 445-470 doi:10.5382/econgeo.5044

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleGeochemical Signatures of Mafic Volcanic Rocks in Modern Oceanic Settings and Implications for Archean Mafic Magmatism
JournalEconomic Geology
AuthorsLorin Fassbender, MarcAuthor
Hannington, MarkAuthor
Thomas Baxter, AlanAuthor
Diekrup, DavidAuthor
Stewart, MargaretAuthor
Alexander Brandl, PhilippAuthor
Year2024 (March)Volume<   119   >
Page(s)445-470Issue<   2   >
URL
DOIdoi:10.5382/econgeo.5044Search in ResearchGate
Classification
Not set
LoC
Not set
Mindat Ref. ID17213026Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:17213026:4
GUID497e865e-534c-44a5-9c14-312bc1c703cb
Full ReferenceLorin Fassbender, Marc, Hannington, Mark, Thomas Baxter, Alan, Diekrup, David, Stewart, Margaret, Alexander Brandl, Philipp (2024) Geochemical Signatures of Mafic Volcanic Rocks in Modern Oceanic Settings and Implications for Archean Mafic Magmatism. Economic Geology, 119 (2) 445-470 doi:10.5382/econgeo.5044
Plain TextLorin Fassbender, Marc, Hannington, Mark, Thomas Baxter, Alan, Diekrup, David, Stewart, Margaret, Alexander Brandl, Philipp (2024) Geochemical Signatures of Mafic Volcanic Rocks in Modern Oceanic Settings and Implications for Archean Mafic Magmatism. Economic Geology, 119 (2) 445-470 doi:10.5382/econgeo.5044
InLink this record to the correct parent record (if possible)
Abstract/NotesGreenstone belts are dominated by mafic volcanic rocks with geochemical characteristics that indicate a range of possible geodynamic influences. Many analogies with modern tectonic settings have been suggested. Increasing exploration of the modern oceans and comprehensive sampling of volcanic rocks from the sea floor are now providing unique opportunities to characterize different melt sources and petrogenesis that can be more closely compared to greenstone belts. In this study, we have compiled high-quality geochemical analyses of more than 2,850 unique samples of submarine mafic volcanic rocks (\\<60 wt \\% SiO2) from a wide range of settings, including mid-ocean ridges, ridge-hotspot intersections, intraoceanic arc and back-arc spreading centers, and ocean islands. The compiled data show significant geochemical variability spanning the full range of compositions of basalts found in greenstone belts. This diversity is interpreted to be due to variable crustal thickness, dry melting versus wet melting conditions, mantle mixing, and contamination. In particular, different melting conditions have been linked to mantle heterogeneity, complex mantle flow regimes, and short-lived tectonic domains, such as those associated with diffuse spreading, overlapping spreading centers, and triple junctions. These are well documented in the microplate mosaics of the Western Pacific.Systematic differences in mafic volcanic rock compositions in modern oceanic settings are revealed by a combination of principal components analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the compiled data. Mafic volcanic rocks from most arc-backarc systems have strongly depleted mantle signatures and well-known subduction-related chemistry such as large ion lithophile element (LILE) enrichment in combination with strong negative Nb-Ta anomalies and low heavy rare earth elements (HREEs). This contrasts with mafic volcanic rocks in Archean greenstone belts, which show no, or at least weaker, subduction-related chemistry, a less depleted mantle, less wet melting, and variable crustal contamination. The differences are interpreted to be the result of the lower mantle temperatures, thinner crust, and subduction-related processes of present-day settings. However, mafic rocks that are geochemically identical to those in Archean greenstone belts occur in many modern back-arc basins, including the Lau basin, East Scotia ridge, Bransfield Strait, and Manus basin, which are characterized by fertile mantle sources, high heat flow, and complex spreading regimes typical of small-scale microplate mosaics. These types of settings are recognized as favorable for volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits in modern and ancient greenstone belts, and therefore the particular geochemical signatures of the mafic volcanic rocks are potentially important for area selection in base metal exploration.

Map of Localities

Mineral Pages

MineralCitation Details
Mid-ocean-ridge basalt

Mineral Occurrences

LocalityMineral(s)
Mt Chacaltaya, Pedro Domingo Murillo Province, La Paz, Boliviaβ“˜ Albite, β“˜ Andalusite, β“˜ Arenite, β“˜ Arsenopyrite, β“˜ Biotite, β“˜ Breccia, β“˜ Cassiterite, β“˜ Chalcopyrite, β“˜ Chlorite Group, β“˜ Cordierite, β“˜ Covellite, β“˜ Dravite, β“˜ Dumortierite, β“˜ Fluorite, β“˜ Foitite, β“˜ Galena, β“˜ Goethite, β“˜ Gold, β“˜ Granite, β“˜ Greisen, β“˜ Hematite, β“˜ K Feldspar, β“˜ Limonite, β“˜ Marcasite, β“˜ Metadiamictite, β“˜ Metasandstone, β“˜ Metasiltstone, β“˜ Muscovite, β“˜ Plagioclase, Plasma, β“˜ Pyrite, β“˜ Pyrrhotite, β“˜ Quartz, β“˜ Quartzite, β“˜ Sandstone, β“˜ Scorodite, β“˜ Shale, β“˜ Siderite, β“˜ Sphalerite, β“˜ Stannite, β“˜ Tourmaline, β“˜ White mica, β“˜ Wolframite Group


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 28, 2024 13:37:29
Go to top of page