Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Agoudal Mines, Tansifte Ca茂dat, Agdz Cercle, Zagora Province, Dr芒a-Tafilalet Region, Morocco
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
---|---|---|---|
Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 | 99.99% | Alloclasite (80.28 %), Anorthoroselite (64.00 %), Bariopharmacosiderite (67.20 %), Claudetite (55.00 %), Cobaltaustinite (64.29 %), Erythrite (69.91 %), Lavendulan (64.33 %), Millerite (66.43 %), Picropharmacolite (58.33 %), Roselite (72.00 %), Sainfeldite (65.63 %), Spherocobaltite (67.80 %), Takovite (52.38 %) |
Pyrite | FeS2 | 99.99% | Alloclasite (74.65 %), Austinite (50.00 %), Bariopharmacosiderite (62.90 %), Calcite (51.16 %), Claudetite (70.00 %), Cobaltaustinite (57.14 %), Dolomite (58.22 %), Erythrite (64.88 %), Lavendulan (59.65 %), Millerite (71.66 %), Picropharmacolite (64.17 %), Sainfeldite (50.00 %), Spherocobaltite (55.93 %), Takovite (57.14 %) |
Malachite | Cu2(CO3)(OH)2 | 99.85% | Austinite (58.33 %), Bariopharmacosiderite (65.05 %), Erythrite (51.09 %), Lavendulan (70.18 %), Roselite (52.00 %), Sainfeldite (56.25 %), Spherocobaltite (67.80 %) |
Sphalerite | ZnS | 97.62% | Alloclasite (56.34 %), Claudetite (55.00 %), Erythrite (50.44 %), Millerite (50.48 %), Picropharmacolite (50.83 %) |
Gypsum | CaSO4 路 2H2O | 97.27% | Claudetite (60.00 %), Lavendulan (59.65 %), Picropharmacolite (50.83 %), Sainfeldite (65.63 %) |
Arsenopyrite | FeAsS | 96.70% | Alloclasite (63.38 %), Cobaltaustinite (50.00 %), Roselite (52.00 %), Sainfeldite (62.50 %) |
Skutterudite | CoAs3 | 96.70% | Anorthoroselite (52.00 %), Roselite (56.00 %), Sainfeldite (84.38 %) |
Conichalcite | CaCu(AsO4)(OH) | 92.85% | Austinite (58.33 %), Cobaltaustinite (64.29 %), Roselite (52.00 %) |
Azurite | Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2 | 89.30% | Austinite (51.19 %), Bariopharmacosiderite (54.30 %), Lavendulan (52.05 %) |
Baryte | BaSO4 | 85.03% | Bariopharmacosiderite (69.89 %), Lavendulan (50.29 %) |
Arsenolite | As2O3 | 83.12% | Claudetite (55.00 %), Sainfeldite (62.50 %) |
Pharmacolite | Ca(HAsO4) 路 2H2O | 83.09% | Picropharmacolite (50.83 %), Sainfeldite (65.63 %) |
Goethite | 伪-Fe3+O(OH) | 81.97% | Bariopharmacosiderite (52.69 %), Takovite (61.90 %) |
Galena | PbS | 79.68% | Alloclasite (54.93 %), Austinite (58.33 %), Bariopharmacosiderite (53.23 %), Claudetite (52.50 %), Erythrite (53.28 %), Lavendulan (54.39 %), Roselite (56.00 %) |
Olivenite | Cu2(AsO4)(OH) | 79.68% | Bariopharmacosiderite (51.08 %), Lavendulan (58.48 %) |
Scorodite | Fe3+AsO4 路 2H2O | 78.12% | Cobaltaustinite (50.00 %), Sainfeldite (56.25 %) |
Hematite | Fe2O3 | 77.50% | Roselite (52.00 %), Sainfeldite (53.13 %) |
Brochantite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 | 75.94% | Bariopharmacosiderite (51.61 %), Lavendulan (50.29 %) |
H枚rnesite | Mg3(AsO4)2 路 8H2O | 65.62% | Sainfeldite (65.63 %) |
Gu茅rinite | Ca6(HAsO4)3(AsO4)2 路 10.5H2O | 62.50% | Sainfeldite (62.50 %) |
L枚llingite | FeAs2 | 62.50% | Sainfeldite (62.50 %) |
Adamite | Zn2(AsO4)(OH) | 59.52% | Austinite (59.52 %) |
Annabergite | Ni3(AsO4)2 路 8H2O | 59.37% | Sainfeldite (59.38 %) |
Parasymplesite | Fe2+3(AsO4)2 路 8H2O | 59.37% | Sainfeldite (59.38 %) |
Arseniosiderite | Ca2Fe3+3(AsO4)3O2 路 3H2O | 57.14% | Cobaltaustinite (57.14 %) |
Rauenthalite | Ca3(AsO4)2 路 10H2O | 56.25% | Sainfeldite (56.25 %) |
Safflorite | (Co,Ni,Fe)As2 | 56.25% | Sainfeldite (56.25 %) |
Mimetite | Pb5(AsO4)3Cl | 55.23% | Austinite (69.05 %) |
Silver | Ag | 55.00% | Sainfeldite (68.75 %) |
Cobaltite | CoAsS | 54.92% | Alloclasite (54.93 %) |
Nickeline | NiAs | 53.12% | Sainfeldite (53.13 %) |
Rammelsbergite | NiAs2 | 50.00% | Sainfeldite (50.00 %) |
Cerussite | PbCO3 | 45.71% | Austinite (57.14 %) |
Proustite | Ag3AsS3 | 42.50% | Sainfeldite (53.13 %) |
Acanthite | Ag2S | 40.00% | Sainfeldite (50.00 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.