Comparing Localities
Comparing:
Ruby Valley Mining District, Elko County, Nevada, USA
with
Baishanpo W deposit, Huzhu Tu Autonomous County, Haidong, Qinghai, China
Mineral Lists
| Ruby Valley Mining District, Elko County, Nevada, USA | Baishanpo W deposit, Huzhu Tu Autonomous County, Haidong, Qinghai, China |
|---|---|
| Actinolite | |
| Beryl | |
| Biotite | |
| Calcite | Calcite |
| Chalcopyrite | |
| Chlorite Group | Chlorite Group |
| Columbite-(Fe)-Columbite-(Mn) Series | |
| Diopside | Diopside |
| Galena | |
| Garnet Group | |
| Granite | |
| Hematite | |
| Hemimorphite | |
| Hydrozincite | |
| Jasper | |
| Limestone | |
| Limonite | |
| Malachite | |
| Muscovite | |
| (Var: Sericite) | |
| Opal | |
| Pegmatite | |
| Phlogopite | |
| Pyrite | Pyrite |
| Pyrrhotite | |
| Quartz | Quartz |
| Scheelite | Scheelite |
| Schist | |
| Spessartine | |
| Sphalerite | |
| Tourmaline | Tourmaline |
| Tremolite | Tremolite |
| Total: 24 | Total: 16 |
Chemistry
Number of mineral & variety species for each element. Red indicates lower than total percentage of mineral species with that element, green indicates higher.
| Element | Ruby Valley Mining District, Elko County, Nevada, USA | Baishanpo W deposit, Huzhu Tu Autonomous County, Haidong, Qinghai, China | Total approved |
|---|---|---|---|
| H | 6 | 5 | 3391 |
| Be | 1 | 0 | 133 |
| B | 1 | 1 | 304 |
| C | 3 | 1 | 491 |
| O | 13 | 12 | 4901 |
| F | 0 | 1 | 487 |
| Mg | 3 | 4 | 828 |
| Al | 3 | 3 | 1217 |
| Si | 8 | 8 | 1673 |
| S | 5 | 1 | 1328 |
| K | 1 | 3 | 606 |
| Ca | 4 | 5 | 1529 |
| Ti | 0 | 1 | 429 |
| Mn | 1 | 0 | 719 |
| Fe | 3 | 4 | 1381 |
| Cu | 2 | 0 | 820 |
| Zn | 3 | 0 | 345 |
| W | 1 | 1 | 54 |
| Pb | 1 | 0 | 637 |
Statistics
| Total Rows: | 32 |
|---|---|
| Total Matches: | 8 |
| Percent Matches: | 25.00% |
