SUPPORT US. Covid-19 has significantly affected our fundraising. Please help!
Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsBooks & Magazines
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryMineral Photography

Owhat Prospect (Cobalt Creek), Aniak District, Bethel Borough, Alaska, USA

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Location: The Owhat prospect is in the Russian Mountains in the cirque valley at the head of Cobalt Creek. The map site is at the approximate center of sec. 8, T. 18 N., R. 54 W., of the Seward Meridian. This is locality 6 of Hoare and Cobb (1972, 1977), and sample locality 13 of Bundtzen and Laird (1991).
Geology: The Owhat, or Cobalt Creek prospect was discovered by Native prospectors before 1900 (Maddren, 1915; Holzheimer, 1926). The deposits include 8 to 10 sulfide-tourmaline-axinite-quartz veins or greisens in syeno-monzonite (Bundtzen and Laird, 1991). The individual greisens are several inches to more than 3 feet thick in a zone that is 5 to 26 feet thick; the average width of the zone is about 8 feet,and it has been traced more than 280 feet vertically. The greisens trend northwest and dip steeply northeast near a contact with an axinite-bearing andesite porphyry dike. The mineralized zone has been traced on the surface for a distance of 870 feet, and extensions totaling 650 feet in both directions are indicated by the distribution of mineralized float. The deposit is mineralogically complex and includes arsenopyrite, aramayoite, bismuth, bismuthite, bornite, chalcopyrite, galena, gold, marcasite, pekoite or gladite, pyrite, sphalerite, stephanite, stetefeldite and tetrahedrite in the sulfide-rich material in the quartz-tourmaline-axinite greisen. Multiple episodes of mineralization are indicated by cross-cutting relations among the veins. Late-forming minerals include arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite, and pyrite, but the youngest cross-cutting assemblages include bornite, stephanite, tetrahedrite, sphalerite, and lead-bismuth sulfides (Bundtzen and Laird, 1991). Microprobe analyses indicate that arsenopyrite contains 0.1 to 0.2 weight percent gold in lattice structures. Bundtzen and Laird (1991) collected 16 chip-channel samples averaging 4.4 feet wide, along 860 feet of the greisen zone. The samples average 5.3 ppm gold, 13.4 percent arsenic, 0.21 percent antimony, 0.39 percent copper, 0.07 percent tin, 0.05 percent zinc, and 0.017 percent cobalt. Assuming dimensions, in feet, of 4.4 x 280 x 870, Bundtzen and Laird (1991) estimated that the resource at this prospect is 63,000 tons of material with the stated average grades. The syeno-monzonite host rocks are part of the Upper Cretaceous intrusive complex of the Russian Mountains (Bundtzen and Laird, 1991).
Workings: Three shallow shafts as much as 40 feet deep and several surface trenches and pits explore about 800 feet of strike length of this deposit.
Age: Late Cretaceous or Tertiary. Veins crosscut part of the intrusive complex of the Russian Mountains. Quartz monzonite from this complex has yielded a K/Ar age of 70.3 +/- 2.1 Ma (Bundtzen and Laird, 1991).
Alteration: Silicification and tourmalinization.
Reserves: Assuming dimensions, in feet, of 4.4 x 280 x 870, Bundtzen and Laird (1991) estimate that the resource at this prospect is 63,000 tons of material with average grades of 5.3 ppm gold, 13.4 percent arsenic, 0.21 percent antimony, 0.39 percent copper, 0.07 percent tin, 0.05 percent zinc, and 0.017 percent cobalt.

Commodities (Major) - Au, Cu, Sb, Sn; (Minor) - Ag, Bi, Co, Pb, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Polymetallic veins (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 22c)

Mineral List

16 entries listed. 14 valid minerals.

The above list contains all mineral locality references listed on This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.


Bundzten, T. K., and Laird, G.M., 1991, Geology and mineral resources of the Russian Mission C-1 Quadrangle, southwest Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Professional Report 109, 24 p. Hoare, J M., and Cobb, E.H., 1972, Metallic mineral resources map of the Russian Mission quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-444, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Hoare, J.M., and Cobb, E.H., 1977, Mineral occurrences (other than mineral fuels and construction materials) in the Bethel, Goodnews, and Russian Mission quadrangles, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 77-156, 98 p. Holzheimer, F.W., 1926, Lode prospects in the Russian Mountains, Kuskokwim River region: Alaska Territorial Department of Mines Miscellaneous Report 81-1, 15 p. Maddren, A.G., 1915, Gold placers of the lower Kuskokwim, with a note on copper in the Russian Mountains: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 622-H, p. 292-360.

Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Public Relations by Blytheweigh.
Copyright © and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2021, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: January 23, 2021 11:31:22 Page generated: January 12, 2015 01:28:36
Go to top of page