Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Zhang, Jian, Wang, Cheng, Lv, Puliang, Qin, Xingming, Huang, Wenlong, Yan, Xiaomin, Shi, Weimin (2024) Petrogenesis and oxidation state of biotite granite, and cassiterite u-pb age from the Debao Cu-Sn skarn deposit, southwestern China: Implications for coupled Cu-Sn mineralization. Ore Geology Reviews, 167. 105971 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.105971

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitlePetrogenesis and oxidation state of biotite granite, and cassiterite u-pb age from the Debao Cu-Sn skarn deposit, southwestern China: Implications for coupled Cu-Sn mineralization
JournalOre Geology Reviews
AuthorsZhang, JianAuthor
Wang, ChengAuthor
Lv, PuliangAuthor
Qin, XingmingAuthor
Huang, WenlongAuthor
Yan, XiaominAuthor
Shi, WeiminAuthor
Year2024Volume<   167   >
Page(s)105971
URL
DOIdoi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.105971Search in ResearchGate
Classification
Not set
LoC
Not set
Mindat Ref. ID17212888Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:17212888:9
GUIDf963ede4-5c7f-4e37-83c7-b1d7f8af8f84
Full ReferenceZhang, Jian, Wang, Cheng, Lv, Puliang, Qin, Xingming, Huang, Wenlong, Yan, Xiaomin, Shi, Weimin (2024) Petrogenesis and oxidation state of biotite granite, and cassiterite u-pb age from the Debao Cu-Sn skarn deposit, southwestern China: Implications for coupled Cu-Sn mineralization. Ore Geology Reviews, 167. 105971 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.105971
Plain TextZhang, Jian, Wang, Cheng, Lv, Puliang, Qin, Xingming, Huang, Wenlong, Yan, Xiaomin, Shi, Weimin (2024) Petrogenesis and oxidation state of biotite granite, and cassiterite u-pb age from the Debao Cu-Sn skarn deposit, southwestern China: Implications for coupled Cu-Sn mineralization. Ore Geology Reviews, 167. 105971 doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.105971
InLink this record to the correct parent record (if possible)
Abstract/NotesCopper and Sn mineralization are seldom formed from the same magmatism due to the distinct geochemistry of Cu and Sn (i.e., Cu and Sn mineralization are usually associated with oxidized mantle-derived intrusions and reduced crust-derived granites, respectively). Previous studies proposed that the formation of Cu-Sn deposits was due to injection of the oxidized mafic magma and/or associated fluids to the reduced magma chambers. The Debao skarn deposit in Guangxi (SW China) has uncommon coupled Cu-Sn mineralization, and it is unclear whether the Cu-Sn mineralization is associated with two different types of magmatism or not. This study presents zircon U-Pb dating, element and Hf-O isotopic data of mineralization-related granites, as well as cassiterite U-Pb ages for the Debao deposit, to constrain the genesis of the coupled Cu-Sn mineralization. The Cu-Sn mineralization is spatially associated with two types of biotite granites: the porphyritic and equigranular biotite granites which have zircon U-Pb ages of 442.5 Β± 3.1 Ma to 439.0 Β± 2.2 Ma and 439.1 Β± 2.6 Ma, respectively. Cassiterite U-Pb dating yielded a mineralization age of 445.6 Β± 3.2 Ma, coeval with the emplacement of both types of granites. The two granites have similar zircon Ξ΄18O values of 6.9–8.4 ‰, and variable Ξ΅Hf(t) values of βˆ’ 9.9 to 6.1 (mostly βˆ’ 3 to 3) with Hf model ages of 2042–1036 Ma, indicating that they were cogenetic and mainly derived from Mesoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the Sibao Group with some input of juvenile materials. The equigranular biotite granites have higher SiO2 contents (74.97–76.41 wt%) and Rb/Sr ratios (10.9–12.6), as well as lower Zr/Hf (23.4–24.6) and Nb/Ta ratios (4.4–5.3) than those of the porphyritic biotite granites (SiO2 = 70.70–73.27 wt%, Rb/Sr = 1.0–2.8, Zr/Hf = 23.4–36.7, Nb/Ta = 7.2–9.4), indicating that the former underwent a much higher degree of magmatic differentiation than the latter. Moreover, the two granites are relatively reduced, as indicated by low zircon Ce4+/Ce3+ ratios (5.1–113.9, mean 41.4) and calculated logfO2 values (βˆ’29.3 to βˆ’ 12.7, mean βˆ’ 20.9), which plot below the FMQ buffer. The Sn and Cu metals likely came from the Sn-rich metasedimentary rocks and the Cu-rich juvenile materials in the magma source region, respectively. Under the reduced and probably S-poor magma system, both the Sn and Cu are relatively incompatible and would be enriched in the residual melts. Therefore, we suggest that the Cu-Sn mineralization at the Debao deposit is genetically associated with the highly fractionated equigranular biotite granites, without the addition of oxidized mafic magma and/or associated fluids. Nevertheless, Cu endowment associated with such reduced magmas is expected to be small.

Map of Localities

Locality Pages

LocalityCitation Details
Debao Cu-Sn deposit (Qinjia Cu-Sn deposit), Debao Co., Baise, Guangxi, China
Duolong deposit, Debao Co., Baise, Guangxi, China

Mineral Occurrences

LocalityMineral(s)
Debao Cu-Sn deposit (Qinjia Cu-Sn deposit), Debao Co., Baise, Guangxi, Chinaβ“˜ Actinolite, β“˜ Allanite Group, β“˜ Andradite, β“˜ Apatite, β“˜ Arsenopyrite, β“˜ Biotite, β“˜ Biotite granite, β“˜ Calcite, β“˜ Cassiterite, β“˜ Chalcopyrite, β“˜ Chlorite Group, β“˜ Conglomerate, β“˜ Diopside, β“˜ Dolerite, β“˜ Endoskarn, β“˜ Epidote, β“˜ Exoskarn, β“˜ Garnet Group, β“˜ Granite, β“˜ Grossular, β“˜ Hedenbergite, β“˜ Hematite, β“˜ Hornfels, β“˜ Ilmenite, β“˜ K Feldspar, β“˜ Limestone, β“˜ Magnetite, β“˜ Marble, β“˜ Molybdenite, β“˜ Mudstone, β“˜ Muscovite, β“˜ Plagioclase, β“˜ Porphyritic granite, β“˜ Pyrite, β“˜ Pyroxene Group, β“˜ Pyrrhotite, β“˜ Quartz, β“˜ Rutile, β“˜ Sandstone, β“˜ Sericite, β“˜ Siltstone, β“˜ Skarn, β“˜ Titanite, β“˜ Zircon


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 27, 2024 17:47:26
Go to top of page