Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Arctic Prospect, Shungnak Mining District, Northwest Arctic Borough, Alaska, USAi
Regional Level Types
Arctic ProspectProspect
Shungnak Mining DistrictMining District
Northwest Arctic BoroughBorough
AlaskaState
USACountry

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
PhotosMapsSearch
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
67° 10' 26'' North , 156° 23' 13'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
KΓΆppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
PlacePopulationDistance
Kobuk158 (2017)36.6km
Mindat Locality ID:
196312
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:196312:3
GUID (UUID V4):
f4784e2a-a6f3-4b43-a1cd-1f310d014764


Location: This prospect is located east of VABM Riley on ridge above Kogoluktuk River in sec. 34, T. 21 N., R. 11 E., of the Kateel River Meridian. The location is shown as a series of prospects on the 1:63,360-scale map. The location is accurate.
Geology: Arctic is one of several volcanogenic deposits in the Ambler schist belt along the south flank of the Brooks Range. The deposits may be part of a rifted continental margin (Schmidt, 1981, p. 548). Arctic is a syngenetic deposit hosted in a thick sequence of Devonian or Mississippian, low to medium-grade metamorphosed basaltic and rhyolitic rocks, submarine ash flow tuffs, volcaniclastic and minor plutonic rocks, and pelitic, carbonaceous and calcareous sedimentary rocks, known as the Ambler schist belt. These rocks are part of a large fold structure termed the Kalurivik arch. A Devonian or Mississippian age of mineralization is based both on fossil evidence and U-Pb radiometric dating (Hitzman and others, 1986, p.1592-1618). The Arctic polymetallic, stratabound, volcanogenic deposit consists of tabular masses of banded massive and disseminated sulfides, one foot to more than 55 feet thick, composed of 20 percent to 90 percent pyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite, along with lesser amounts of pyrrhotite, chalcocite, bornite, galena, tennantite-tetrahedrite, arsenopyrite and stibnite (Schmidt, 1988). The sulfides are enclosed in calcareous talcose to quartzose lenses within a metavolcanic (rhyolitic) unit. The mineralized area is 3,000 feet by 2,200 feet in area and about 270 feet thick. The massive sulfide occurrences are covered by a small gossan cap 9 to 15 feet deep. Kennecott completed 70 drill holes in the Arctic deposit in the 1970's and defined an inferred resource of 36.3 million tons grading 4.0 percent copper, 5.5 percent zinc, 0.8 percent lead, 0.7 gram of gold per ton, and 54.9 grams of silver per ton, or 8.0 percent copper equivalent. (Eakins and others, 1985, p. 6). NovaGold Resources, Inc. (2007, Ambler) reached an earn-in agreement with Kennecott Exploration Company and Kennecott Arctic Company (subsidiaries of Rio Tinto PLC) in March 2004. The agreement covers a 35,000 acre area in the Ambler district. Initial exploration by NovaGold in 2004 focused on the Arctic deposit and included new descriptions of existing core, structural geology studies, and the drilling of 11 infill holes totaling 9,768 feet (2,978 meters). These holes confirmed previous drill results and helped refine the 3-D geologic model for the Arctic deposit. Some 2004 drill intercepts reported by NovaGold include: 1) hole AR04-80 with 6.5 meters (11.5 feet) grading 3.36 percent copper, 0.91 gram of gold per ton, 1.90 percent lead, and 7.93 percent zinc; 2) hole AR04-86 with 12.5 m (41 feet) grading 3.76 percent copper, 0.91 gram of gold per ton, 52.4 grams of silver per ton, 0.58 percent lead, and 6.01 percent zinc, or an 8.0 percent copper equivalent; 3) hole AR04-87 with 7.4 m (24 feet) grading 9.65 percent copper, 0.73 grams of gold per ton, 108.2 grams of silver per ton, 1.64 percent lead, and 10.35 percent zinc, or 16.9 percent copper equivalent. As of April 2007, NovaGold Resources Inc. is actively exploring the deposit (NovaGold Resources, Inc., 2007, Ambler). In 2005, NovaGold drilled about 3,000 meters of core hole and carried out district-scale surface geology, geochemistry, and geophysical surveys. In 2006, NovaGold drilled 12 holes to test geophysical anomalies near the Arctic deposit and outlined additional mineralization. They also carried out extensive detailed surface geologic mapping and geochemical surveying. NovaGold continues to cite the 1970's resource figures for the size of the deposit but a new resource assessment based on their recent work is underway and should be completed in 2007.
Workings: Kennecott completed 70 drill holes in the Arctic deposit and defined an inferred resource of 36.3 million tons of ore in the 1970s. NovaGold Resources, Inc. reached an earn-in agreement with Kennecott Exploration Company and Kennecott Arctic Company (subsidiaries of Rio Tinto PLC) in March 2004. The agreement covers a 35,000 acre area in the Ambler district. Initial exploration by NovaGold in 2004 focused on the Arctic deposit and included new descriptions of existing core, structural geology studies, and the drilling of 11 infill holes totaling 9,768 feet (2,978 meters). NovaGold's exploration in 2005 included district-scale surface geology, geochemistry, and geophysical surveys and up to about 3,000 meters (9,800 feet) of core drilling on the Arctic deposit. In 2006, NovaGold drilled 12 holes to test geophysical anomalies near the Arctic deposit and outlined additional mineralization. They also carried out extensive detailed surface geologic mapping and geochemical surveying.
Age: Devonian-Mississippian, the age of the host rocks.
Alteration: Chlorite-rich rocks in footwall and surrounding the sulfides form an alteration zone containing a complex assemblage of barium fluorphlogopite, talc, Mg-chlorite, barite, phengite, quartz, and calcite (Schmidt, 1988).
Reserves: The indicated reserves of 36.3 million tons grading 4.0 percent copper, 5.5 percent zinc, 1 percent lead, 1.6 ounces of silver per ton and 0.03 ounces of gold per ton, have long been documented based on the Kennecott work in the 1970's (Eakins and others, 1985, p. 6). The same 'inferred resources' are currently (April 2007) being reported by NovaGold Gold Resources, Inc. who are now drilling the prospect and carrying out geologic and geochemical studies to define additional resources. A new resource assessment based on their recent work is underway and should be completed in 2007.

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Au, Cu, Pb, Zn; (Minor) - Sb
Development Status: No
Deposit Model: Kuroko massive sulfide (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 28a)

Select Mineral List Type

Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical Elements

Commodity List

This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.


Mineral List


13 valid minerals.

Detailed Mineral List:

β“˜ Arsenopyrite
Formula: FeAsS
β“˜ Baryte
Formula: BaSO4
β“˜ Bornite
Formula: Cu5FeS4
β“˜ Calcite
Formula: CaCO3
β“˜ Chalcocite
Formula: Cu2S
β“˜ Chalcopyrite
Formula: CuFeS2
β“˜ Galena
Formula: PbS
β“˜ Pyrite
Formula: FeS2
β“˜ Pyrrhotite
Formula: Fe1-xS
β“˜ Quartz
Formula: SiO2
β“˜ Sphalerite
Formula: ZnS
β“˜ Stibnite
Formula: Sb2S3
β“˜ Talc
Formula: Mg3Si4O10(OH)2

Gallery:

List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification

Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts
β“˜Chalcocite2.BA.05Cu2S
β“˜Bornite2.BA.15Cu5FeS4
β“˜Sphalerite2.CB.05aZnS
β“˜Chalcopyrite2.CB.10aCuFeS2
β“˜Pyrrhotite2.CC.10Fe1-xS
β“˜Galena2.CD.10PbS
β“˜Stibnite2.DB.05Sb2S3
β“˜Pyrite2.EB.05aFeS2
β“˜Arsenopyrite2.EB.20FeAsS
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides
β“˜Quartz4.DA.05SiO2
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates
β“˜Calcite5.AB.05CaCO3
Group 7 - Sulphates, Chromates, Molybdates and Tungstates
β“˜Baryte7.AD.35BaSO4
Group 9 - Silicates
β“˜Talc9.EC.05Mg3Si4O10(OH)2

Other Databases

Link to USGS - Alaska:AR025

Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality

North America
North America PlateTectonic Plate

This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Bottge, R.G., 1975, Impact of a natural gas pipeline on mineral and energy development in Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 20-75, 177 p. Bundtzen, T.K., Swainbank, R.C., Clough, A.H., Henning, M.W., and Charlie, K.M., 1996, Alaska's mineral industry, 1995: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Special Report 50, 72 p. Degenhart, C.E., Griffis, R.J., McQuat, J.F., and Bigelow, C.G., 1978, Mineral studies of the western Brooks Range performed under contract to the U.S. Bureau of Mines, Contract #JO155089: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 103-78, 529 p., 11 sheets. Dillon, J.T., Pessel, G.H., Chen, J.H., and Veach, N.C., 1979, Tectonic and economic significance of late Devonian and late Proterozoic U-Pb zircon ages from Brooks Range, Alaska: in Short Notes on Alaskan Geology, 1978: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Geologic Report 63, p. 36-41. Eakins, G.R., Bundtzen, T.K., Lueck, L.L. Green, C.B., Gallagher, J.L., and Robinson, M.S., 1985, Alaska mineral industry, 1984: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys Special Report 38, 57 p. Grybeck, D.J., and Nokleberg, W.J., 1979, Metallogeny of the Brooks Range, Alaska, in Johnson, K.M., and Williams, J.R., Jr., The United States Geological Survey in Alaska--Accomplishments during 1978: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 804-B, p. B19-B22. Hitzman, M.W., Profett, J.M., Jr., Schmidt, J.M., and Smith, T.E., 1986, Geology and mineralization of the Ambler district, northwestern Alaska: Economic Geology, v. 81, p. 1592-1618. Mayfield, C.F., and Grybeck, D., 1978, Mineral occurrences and resource map of the Ambler River quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-120-I, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. NovaGold Resources, Inc., 2007 (Ambler): http://www.novagold.net/s/Ambler.asp (as of March 2007). Schmidt, J.M., 1981, Volcano
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 00:56:14 Page updated: April 14, 2024 03:00:08
Go to top of page