Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Thailand
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
| Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Troilite | FeS | 95.53% | Iron (71.02 %), Taenite (84.60 %) |
| Chromite | Fe2+Cr3+2O4 | 81.64% | Iron (51.19 %), Taenite (62.40 %) |
| Fluorapatite | Ca5(PO4)3F | 80.27% | Montgomeryite (51.79 %), Robertsite (59.09 %) |
| Azurite | Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2 | 78.11% | Cuprite (51.54 %), Philipsbornite (54.84 %) |
| Brochantite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 | 77.44% | Hidalgoite (50.65 %), Linarite (54.30 %) |
| Tephroite | Mn2+2SiO4 | 75.00% | Galaxite (75.00 %) |
| Rhodochrosite | MnCO3 | 73.07% | Galaxite (73.08 %) |
| Hureaulite | Mn2+5(PO3OH)2(PO4)2 路 4H2O | 72.72% | Robertsite (72.73 %) |
| Rhodonite | CaMn3Mn[Si5O15] | 71.15% | Galaxite (71.15 %) |
| Mitridatite | Ca2Fe3+3(PO4)3O2 路 3H2O | 61.36% | Robertsite (61.36 %) |
| Phosphosiderite | FePO4 路 2H2O | 61.36% | Robertsite (61.36 %) |
| Strengite | FePO4 路 2H2O | 56.81% | Robertsite (56.82 %) |
| Variscite | AlPO4 路 2H2O | 55.35% | Montgomeryite (55.36 %) |
| Uraninite | UO2 | 54.77% | Brannerite (54.77 %) |
| Rockbridgeite | Fe2+Fe3+4(PO4)3(OH)5 | 54.54% | Robertsite (54.55 %) |
| Jacobsite | Mn2+Fe3+2O4 | 53.84% | Galaxite (53.85 %) |
| Hausmannite | Mn2+Mn3+2O4 | 51.92% | Galaxite (51.92 %) |
| Pyrophanite | Mn2+TiO3 | 51.92% | Galaxite (51.92 %) |
| Crandallite | CaAl3(PO4)(PO3OH)(OH)6 | 51.78% | Montgomeryite (51.79 %) |
| Autunite | Ca(UO2)2(PO4)2 路 10-12H2O | 51.51% | Torbernite (51.52 %) |
| Tellurium | Te | 51.51% | Tellurite (51.52 %) |
| Beraunite | Fe3+6(PO4)4O(OH)4 路 6H2O | 50.00% | Robertsite (50.00 %) |
| Frondelite | Mn2+Fe3+4(PO4)3(OH)5 | 50.00% | Robertsite (50.00 %) |
| Heterosite | (Fe3+,Mn3+)PO4 | 50.00% | Robertsite (50.00 %) |
| Triphylite | LiFe2+PO4 | 47.27% | Robertsite (59.09 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.