Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Gila County, Arizona, USA
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
| Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phosgenite | Pb2CO3Cl2 | 86.62% | Matlockite (57.50 %), Paralaurionite (68.52 %) |
| Arsenopyrite | FeAsS | 74.10% | Scorodite (74.10 %) |
| Schulenbergite | (Cu,Zn)7(SO4)2(OH)10 路 3H2O | 72.36% | Ramsbeckite (72.37 %) |
| Langite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 路 2H2O | 71.05% | Ramsbeckite (71.05 %) |
| Beyerite | Ca(BiO)2(CO3)2 | 70.37% | Namibite (70.37 %) |
| Paratacamite | Cu3(Cu,Zn)(OH)6Cl2 | 66.66% | Anthonyite (66.67 %) |
| Bustamite | CaMn2+(Si2O6) | 66.66% | Ruizite (66.67 %) |
| Caryopilite | Mn2+3Si2O5(OH)4 | 66.66% | Ruizite (66.67 %) |
| Groutite | Mn3+O(OH) | 66.66% | Ruizite (66.67 %) |
| Hausmannite | Mn2+Mn3+2O4 | 66.66% | Ruizite (66.67 %) |
| Dugganite | Pb3Zn3(AsO4)2(TeO6) | 64.28% | Kuksite (64.29 %) |
| Zeunerite | Cu(UO2)2(AsO4)2 路 12H2O | 60.00% | Metanov谩膷ekite (60.00 %) |
| Adamite | Zn2(AsO4)(OH) | 59.52% | Austinite (59.52 %) |
| Cornwallite | Cu5(AsO4)2(OH)4 | 58.21% | Clinoclase (58.22 %) |
| Pyrargyrite | Ag3SbS3 | 57.94% | Stephanite (57.94 %) |
| Caledonite | Pb5Cu2(SO4)3(CO3)(OH)6 | 55.65% | Lanarkite (55.65 %) |
| Franklinite | Zn2+Fe3+2O4 | 55.55% | Clinohedrite (55.56 %) |
| Laurionite | PbCl(OH) | 55.55% | Paralaurionite (55.56 %) |
| Bismuthinite | Bi2S3 | 55.00% | Koechlinite (55.00 %) |
| Posnjakite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 路 H2O | 53.94% | Ramsbeckite (53.95 %) |
| Terlinguaite | [Hg3]4+Hg2+Cl2O2 | 53.84% | Eglestonite (53.85 %) |
| Analcime | Na(AlSi2O6) 路 H2O | 52.00% | Mesolite (52.00 %) |
| Eulytine | Bi4(SiO4)3 | 51.85% | Namibite (51.85 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.