Predictive Mineralogy
Possible unrecorded species at Lichtloch 25 (of the Schl眉ssel-Stollen), Mansfeld, Mansfeld-S眉dharz, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.
Possible missing species | Formula | Match % | Due to recorded presence of |
---|---|---|---|
Quartz | SiO2 | 99.99% | Anglesite (68.30 %), Azurite (64.09 %), Cerussite (63.56 %), Connellite (70.98 %), Copper (56.56 %), Cuprite (65.19 %), Elyite (50.54 %), Ferrobustamite (52.00 %), Lanarkite (62.61 %), Linarite (74.40 %), Malachite (61.21 %), Namuwite (72.60 %), Nantokite (60.00 %), Serpierite (72.17 %), Silver (59.03 %) |
Galena | PbS | 99.99% | Anglesite (86.19 %), Cerussite (83.05 %), Elyite (68.82 %), Lanarkite (77.39 %), Linarite (83.08 %), Litharge (59.51 %), Namuwite (78.08 %), Serpierite (74.78 %), Silver (52.62 %) |
Calcite | CaCO3 | 99.99% | Anglesite (53.86 %), Cerussite (50.77 %), Connellite (57.18 %), Elyite (59.14 %), Ferrobustamite (76.00 %), Hardystonite (55.56 %), Lanarkite (64.35 %), Linarite (56.51 %), Litharge (53.37 %), Monohydrocalcite (69.57 %), Namuwite (63.01 %), Nantokite (60.00 %), Serpierite (67.83 %) |
Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 | 99.99% | Anglesite (58.14 %), Azurite (65.18 %), Connellite (65.52 %), Copper (53.15 %), Cuprite (67.05 %), Ferrobustamite (56.00 %), Linarite (69.97 %), Malachite (60.66 %), Namuwite (67.12 %), Serpierite (75.36 %), Silver (50.22 %) |
Pyrite | FeS2 | 99.99% | Anglesite (64.19 %), Azurite (58.39 %), Cerussite (56.77 %), Connellite (55.17 %), Cuprite (58.26 %), Ferrobustamite (56.00 %), Linarite (63.77 %), Malachite (52.79 %), Namuwite (63.01 %), Serpierite (71.30 %), Silver (54.72 %) |
Sphalerite | ZnS | 99.97% | Anglesite (64.09 %), Cerussite (56.70 %), Ferrobustamite (68.00 %), Hardystonite (50.00 %), Lanarkite (53.91 %), Linarite (66.52 %), Namuwite (75.34 %), Serpierite (70.43 %) |
Brochantite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 | 99.87% | Connellite (68.10 %), Elyite (73.12 %), Lanarkite (56.52 %), Linarite (54.30 %), Namuwite (76.71 %), Serpierite (69.57 %) |
Gypsum | CaSO4 路 2H2O | 99.62% | Elyite (59.14 %), Hardystonite (55.56 %), Lanarkite (52.17 %), Monohydrocalcite (53.62 %), Namuwite (71.23 %), Serpierite (67.54 %) |
Goethite | 伪-Fe3+O(OH) | 98.50% | Connellite (52.87 %), Elyite (59.14 %), Lanarkite (56.52 %), Namuwite (63.01 %), Serpierite (51.59 %) |
Aragonite | CaCO3 | 92.56% | Elyite (53.76 %), Lanarkite (53.04 %), Namuwite (65.75 %) |
Covellite | CuS | 90.39% | Elyite (52.69 %), Namuwite (57.53 %), Serpierite (52.17 %) |
Langite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 路 2H2O | 85.04% | Elyite (62.37 %), Namuwite (60.27 %) |
Caledonite | Pb5Cu2(SO4)3(CO3)(OH)6 | 84.26% | Elyite (64.52 %), Lanarkite (55.65 %) |
Leadhillite | Pb4(CO3)2(SO4)(OH)2 | 82.32% | Elyite (51.61 %), Lanarkite (63.48 %) |
Hydrocerussite | Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2 | 81.15% | Elyite (61.29 %), Lanarkite (51.30 %) |
Magnetite | Fe2+Fe3+2O4 | 80.44% | Ferrobustamite (56.00 %), Hardystonite (55.56 %) |
Wollastonite | Ca3(Si3O9) | 68.00% | Ferrobustamite (68.00 %) |
Schulenbergite | (Cu,Zn)7(SO4)2(OH)10 路 3H2O | 65.75% | Namuwite (65.75 %) |
Hydrozincite | Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6 | 63.01% | Namuwite (63.01 %) |
Smithsonite | ZnCO3 | 63.01% | Namuwite (63.01 %) |
Willemite | Zn2SiO4 | 61.11% | Hardystonite (61.11 %) |
Zincite | ZnO | 61.11% | Hardystonite (61.11 %) |
Aurichalcite | (Zn,Cu)5(CO3)2(OH)6 | 60.27% | Namuwite (60.27 %) |
Atacamite | Cu2(OH)3Cl | 57.50% | Nantokite (57.50 %) |
Hematite | Fe2O3 | 55.55% | Hardystonite (55.56 %) |
Sulphur | S8 | 54.79% | Namuwite (54.79 %) |
Posnjakite | Cu4(SO4)(OH)6 路 H2O | 52.05% | Namuwite (52.05 %) |
Hedenbergite | CaFe2+Si2O6 | 52.00% | Ferrobustamite (52.00 %) |
Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS | 52.00% | Ferrobustamite (52.00 %) |
Hemimorphite | Zn4Si2O7(OH)2 路 H2O | 50.68% | Namuwite (50.68 %) |
Baryte | BaSO4 | 40.54% | Namuwite (50.68 %) |
Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)
Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit
Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.